Hi Everyone. Well, after 15 years the RV-Dreams Community Forum is coming to an end. Since it began in August 2005, we've had 58 Million page views, 124,000 posts, and we've spent about $15,000 to keep this valuable resource for RVers free and open. But since we are now off the road and have settled down for the next chapter of our lives, we are taking the Forum down effective June 30, 2021. It has been a tough decision, but it is now time.
We want to thank all of our members for their participation and input over the years, and we want to especially thank those that have acted as Moderators for us during our amazing journey living and traveling in our RV and growing the RV-Dreams Family. We will be forever proud to have been founders of this Forum and to have been supported by such a wonderful community. Thank you all!!
It's our first major destination. What's bizarre is until a couple weeks ago, I didn't know it existed. I'd seen it in "2010, the year we make contact," but I hadn't even a shred of a clue. No, I didn't see the movie "Contact" until last week. I will dine sumptuously in PIE!!! TOWN!!!, crash near Datil and cruise the toad to the array, the next day. I want the scientist's tour of that place. As many photos as I can take. I'll drag out my Nikons for that one. So many lenses, so many views, so little time. But you know, looking out there, I bet you could put a drone over the top of that place and get some pretty spectacular down angles.
-- Edited by Old_Man on Thursday 1st of March 2018 08:13:05 AM
Limit your lenses IMO. It makes views and time easier.
__________________
Winnebago TT 2101DS & 2020 Silverado LTZ Z71. 300 watts WindyNation solar w/MPPT, 2 Trojan T-125s. TALL flag pole. Prefer USFS, COE, BLM, USF&WS, NPS, TVA, state/county camps. 14 year Army vet-11B40 then 11A - old MOS 1542 & 1560.
Limiting lenses isn't always a good idea. It can lead to lesser quality pictures. If one is serious about photos (note I didn't say photography), a variety is good. I'm also a Nikon shooter and have a total of five lenses, four of which are full frame ones.
Terry
__________________
Terry and Jo
2010 Mobile Suites 38TKSB3 2008 Ford F450 2019 Ford Expedition Max as Tag-along or Scout
Limiting lenses isn't always a good idea. It can lead to lesser quality pictures. If one is serious about photos (note I didn't say photography), a variety is good. I'm also a Nikon shooter and have a total of five lenses, four of which are full frame ones.
Terry
That is completely correct. I sold my 400mmF3.5 lens when I got out of the business, but with digital, it'd be like a 600, anyway. But I have a 100-300 AF zoom I use. All other lenses are manual focus. I find long lenses more useful in general, but if you're a working pro, you need it all. At least access to it all. Rent what you only use once in a while, add the cost into the rate.
I still have my little 75-150 Series E zoom lends VERY useful lens in regular to high-light situations. Not so good for low light.
At the Array, I won't even shoot in the middle of the day, I prefer early morning or late evening (but before sunset) Even with digital, I'll 'push-process.' Love me some shutter speed. I'll pull out a few photos for y'all. Maybe tomorrow.
... I bet you could put a drone over the top of that place and get some pretty spectacular down angles.
Probably not allowed.
Rob
I looked at a current sectional aeronautical chart for that area (Albuquerque, I used to fly light planes) and at the altitudes drones fly, there is no airspace restriction of any kind at the VLA. That said, I would not be stupid about it. I would fly behind the dishes, not in front of them. That's an air safety issue. The radio waves emitting from the antennae are far more than enough to probably destroy any radio receiver that cuts through the beam. In addition, a lot of work would be destroyed if you cut through a beam. Not to mention, the FAA would put massive, reactionary restrictions on the airspace if that happened. So, I'd keep my distance. A drone shot would mostly be a wide shot, unless you had a reason to do different. As a civilian, erring on the side of caution, I'll fly but I'll keep my distance and fly only early/late in the day.