Hi Everyone. Well, after 15 years the RV-Dreams Community Forum is coming to an end. Since it began in August 2005, we've had 58 Million page views, 124,000 posts, and we've spent about $15,000 to keep this valuable resource for RVers free and open. But since we are now off the road and have settled down for the next chapter of our lives, we are taking the Forum down effective June 30, 2021. It has been a tough decision, but it is now time.
We want to thank all of our members for their participation and input over the years, and we want to especially thank those that have acted as Moderators for us during our amazing journey living and traveling in our RV and growing the RV-Dreams Family. We will be forever proud to have been founders of this Forum and to have been supported by such a wonderful community. Thank you all!!
Not unbelievable at all. A company made a loan. They didn't get paid.
They knew they weren't going to get paid, so they "wrote it off". That is a forgiveness of debt and that is income to the borrower (i.e. the borrower got money from the lender as a loan, but when they didn't pay it back it became income).
This could happen in any debt situation. And it is a danger in debt consolidation or negotiations. If a lender agrees to a lower amount of repayment in "full settlement" of a debt, the unpaid amount of the debt is still income to the borrower. The lender is required to file form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt and the borrower is supposed to report that on their 1040 as Other Income.
Before 2007, that applied to mortgage foreclosures as well. For example, a foreclosure occurred on a home worth $200,000 with a debt of $180,000. The lender sold the home for $150,000 and "wrote off" the other $30,000. That $30,000 is taxable income to the borrower. At least it was until the Debt Relief Act of 2007.
For 2007, 2008, & 2009 the canceled debt on a primary residence can be excluded from income according to that recent law. There are limits and nuances, but it would apply to most people.
There is also an "insolvency" exclusion, but it also comes with specific requirements.
Apparently there was no insurance in this particular case.