Hi Everyone. Well, after 15 years the RV-Dreams Community Forum is coming to an end. Since it began in August 2005, we've had 58 Million page views, 124,000 posts, and we've spent about $15,000 to keep this valuable resource for RVers free and open. But since we are now off the road and have settled down for the next chapter of our lives, we are taking the Forum down effective June 30, 2021. It has been a tough decision, but it is now time.
We want to thank all of our members for their participation and input over the years, and we want to especially thank those that have acted as Moderators for us during our amazing journey living and traveling in our RV and growing the RV-Dreams Family. We will be forever proud to have been founders of this Forum and to have been supported by such a wonderful community. Thank you all!!
We have looked at the "new" Front Bathroom models in several lines of RVs. It occurs to me that the FW, GW & BW tanks for these appear to be positioned in the forward part of some models. Would this design be a cause for higher pin weights or lower basement loading potential? I'm assuming that GW & BW would be dumped prior to hooking up and moving the rig, as well as most of the FW unless boondocking was the next stop. Still, there is the bulk and weight of the actual tanks in a forward location to contend with. Any thoughts on this possible "issue". Those you out there that have one of these types of floorplans/rigs, any experiences you can enlighten me/us with in this area.
Never owned one of that type, but I would think that unless all the bathroom,kitchen, and other sinks and the like are "upstairs", then all or most of the tanks must be "downstairs". Just my opinion.
If in fact some are located "upstairs" then it would raise the pin weight a considerable amount.
Jim
__________________
Jim. KM5J
2014 6.7L Ram 3500, 2008 Excel w 280 watts of solar , 2012 Jack Russel.
Just a thought for you, based on the experience we have with ours. Our bathroom is just in front of the kitchen/entry door area of our coach. As it is arranged, the black tank is directly below the toilet, so when we flush, it goes straight down and into the black tank. When getting near full, a flashlight allows me to see just how close the level of the liquids in the tank are to the toilet "drop pipe." Dang little chance of over flow, and absolutely no issue with a stopped up line from a toilet in another area to the tank.
Terry
__________________
Terry and Jo
2010 Mobile Suites 38TKSB3 2008 Ford F450 2019 Ford Expedition Max as Tag-along or Scout
You made me think about this question, since we are looking at a front-bath Lifestyle 39FB model. Surprisingly, the listed pin weight for the 39FB is 329lbs lighter than the slightly shorter 38RS, which isn't a front bath model. If I'm not mistaken, the tube from the front bath toilet goes aft and down to the lower level black tank location. Not sure about the gray tank location. The other oddity between these two models is that the black and gray tanks are much larger on the 39FB over the 38RS. I think I'd rather have the 38RS, but the tank size is a big turnoff.
Roy
__________________
Let's Roll, America!
Fulltimer Class of Late 2015, with my beautiful bride, Lori.
2015 GMC 3500HD Denali DRW CC LB TrailerSaver TS3 Hitch
2016 DRV Mobile Suites 38RSB3, MorRyde IS, MorRyde Pin Box
Roy, the Lifestyle line is one of our current top picks, we plan a tour of the factory, along with DRV and couple of others this year (we're only 2 1/2 hours away). I'll be paying attention to such technical/engineering points among other details. I was puzzled about the lighter pin on the 39FB also, but the BW & GW tank location further aft could be part of the explanation, perhaps there is more weight in the rear of the trailer to offset also. The 38RS was in front of the 39FB until we started to consider the 1/2 bath as a pantry/storage room instead. Jury is still out.
Brian
-- Edited by biggaRView on Thursday 19th of March 2015 05:06:56 AM
We have looked at the "new" Front Bathroom models in several lines of RVs. It occurs to me that the FW, GW & BW tanks for these appear to be positioned in the forward part of some models. Would this design be a cause for higher pin weights or lower basement loading potential? I'm assuming that GW & BW would be dumped prior to hooking up and moving the rig, as well as most of the FW unless boondocking was the next stop. Still, there is the bulk and weight of the actual tanks in a forward location to contend with. Any thoughts on this possible "issue". Those you out there that have one of these types of floorplans/rigs, any experiences you can enlighten me/us with in this area.
Brain:
This is an “in general” comment to the general assumption: “I'm assuming that GW & BW would be dumped prior to hooking up and moving the rig, as well as most of the FW unless boondocking was the next stop.”
Don’t count on it – including the dumping of the fresh water tank.We run into a lot of situations, other than boondocking, that require us to “tanker water” in all tanks. That is carry fresh, grey and black between sites.Sometime it just is necessary for various reasons including always having enough fresh water to get by if there is a fresh water issue at the next stop.(Been there many times.) So from an “engineering perspective” I wouldn’t plan on always being able to travel with mostly empty tanks.
The fresh water tank should always be over the axles, IMO.After that, each rig is different.Some even have two gray water tanks.“It depends” and naturally the further forward the BW / GW tanks the more pin weight.But that’s where a lot of them have to go due to space.
I personally wouldn’t have a black tank anywhere but right under the toilet.Some rigs use macerators to get around long black water lines.But I wouldn’t do that. A major issue if, make that when, the macerator pump goes bad.I would call it “mission critical” and a critical point of failure I wouldn’t want.But that’s just the “engineer” in my genes.
Roy, the Lifestyle line is one of our current top picks, we plan a tour of the factory, along with DRV and couple of others this year (we're only 2 1/2 hours away). I'll be paying attention to such technical/engineering points among other details. I was puzzled about the lighter pin on the 39FB also, but the BW & GW tank location further aft could be part of the explanation, perhaps there is more weight in the rear of the trailer to offset also. The 38RS was in front of the 39FB until we started to consider the 1/2 bath as a pantry/storage room instead. Jury is still out.
Brian
-- Edited by biggaRView on Thursday 19th of March 2015 05:06:56 AM
Brian:
I should have commented FWIW – It has been my experience few manufactures give the published pin or dry weight with any water in the BW or GW tank.Many give the published – not the placard - dry weight without any fresh water either or make a note as to the conditions of the weight. The published dry weight is supposed to include full LP tanks as you can’t “off load” LP like you can fresh water.I.e. you can’t get rid of it by draining the LP tanks “at will” and thereby reducing weight – so it should be included. IMO this published dry weight means very little as it seldom includes options in the generic marketing stuff.I’d just keep that in mind. I’m sure you know how much weight you can add with awnings, generators, batteries and air conditioners to name a few. Sometimes not even the furniture - if its an option - will be included in the marketing material.
Regardless, the only numbers that matter are the ones on each individual coach when delivered – the ones on the placard.The rules now say they must weigh each coach as is when manufactured and that is what goes on the sticker.I was there when we took our “virgin” rig to the scale for its official dry weighing prior to delivery.Kind of rare to get to do that.
Roy, the Lifestyle line is one of our current top picks, we plan a tour of the factory, along with DRV and couple of others this year (we're only 2 1/2 hours away). I'll be paying attention to such technical/engineering points among other details. I was puzzled about the lighter pin on the 39FB also, but the BW & GW tank location further aft could be part of the explanation, perhaps there is more weight in the rear of the trailer to offset also. The 38RS was in front of the 39FB until we started to consider the 1/2 bath as a pantry/storage room instead. Jury is still out.
Brian
-- Edited by biggaRView on Thursday 19th of March 2015 05:06:56 AM
That's funny, Brian. We, too, are looking at deleting the 1/2 bath toilet and vanity/sink, so we can have a walk-in pantry instead. I contacted Lifestyle through a dealer and they said that they are able/willing to delete the toilet and vanity. We would use it for pantry storage and for a chest freezer space. The difference in fluid tank size is considerable with the 39FB. If you want to chat, we can discuss all the optional stuff we will do with the Lifestyle if we choose that brand. I have researched these a ton, and have a list of options that we will select (and that Lifestyle offers.) If we don't go with the Lifestyle, we will bite the bullet and design a custom New Horizon's fifth wheel. None of the other brands make the cut for us.
Roy
__________________
Let's Roll, America!
Fulltimer Class of Late 2015, with my beautiful bride, Lori.
2015 GMC 3500HD Denali DRW CC LB TrailerSaver TS3 Hitch
2016 DRV Mobile Suites 38RSB3, MorRyde IS, MorRyde Pin Box
There are many factors that go into the pin weight, it can be adjusted (to a degree) by the placement of the axels. Perhaps they take the potential weight into account and move the axels as required to keep the pin weight within reason.
Flyone
__________________
Team Cockrum: 2001, F250 Diesel, 2012 33 FT. CrossRoads Cruiser Fifth Wheel